Can a Chemical Engineering Student Be Expelled for Fabricating Liquid-Liquid Extraction Partition Logs?

Maryam Usman
Oct 28, 2026 • 3 min read
Can a Chemical Engineering Student Be Expelled for Fabricating Liquid-Liquid Extraction Partition Logs?
Can a Chemical Engineering Student Be Expelled for Fabricating Liquid-Liquid Extraction Partition Logs?
Quick Overview

Key Takeaways & Educational Highlights

  • The mass transfer operations course lecturer audits submitted practical portfolios and identifies mathematically idealized Hand or Othmer-Tobias tie-line correlations that ignore mutual liquid solubility...
  • The chief laboratory technologist checks the chemical engineering pilot plant sign-in register and confirms that the student never signed out separating funnels, mixer-settler units,...
  • The technologist checks the chemical dispensary ledger and confirms that no glacial acetic acid, ethyl acetate, or standardized sodium hydroxide was requisitioned under the...

A university will summarily expel a chemical or petroleum refining engineering undergraduate, cancel all separation processes and chemical thermodynamics laboratory credits, and report the student to the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN) for professional debarment for fabricating liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) partition coefficient logs, faking ternary liquid-liquid equilibrium binodal tie-line titration curves, or forging chemical engineering laboratory instructor verification signatures without conducting physical solvent extraction bench experiments. In chemical engineering curricula accredited by COREN, separation processes and solvent extraction—such as contacting acetic acid-water mixtures with organic solvents (such as ethyl acetate or toluene) in separating funnels or continuous mixer-settler units, titrating raffinate and extract phases with standardized sodium hydroxide, and calculating distribution coefficients ($K_D$) and extraction efficiencies—represent a life-critical technical competency; fabricating extraction data subverts industrial solvent extraction plant designs, conceals hazardous chemical separation failures, and violates professional engineering ethics.

Departmental laboratory coordinators and unit operations examiners utilize automated titrator and refractometer usage logs to detect fabricated experimental submissions.

  1. The mass transfer operations course lecturer audits submitted practical portfolios and identifies mathematically idealized Hand or Othmer-Tobias tie-line correlations that ignore mutual liquid solubility non-idealities.
  2. The chief laboratory technologist checks the chemical engineering pilot plant sign-in register and confirms that the student never signed out separating funnels, mixer-settler units, or analytical glassware.
  3. The technologist checks the chemical dispensary ledger and confirms that no glacial acetic acid, ethyl acetate, or standardized sodium hydroxide was requisitioned under the student’s assigned project codes.
  4. The student is formally issued an academic query requiring them to perform a live liquid-liquid phase separation in a separating funnel and determine distribution coefficients via acid-base titration.
  5. Inability to demonstrate phase boundary separation techniques or replicate titration calculations leads to a formal charge of scientific fabrication and academic fraud.
  6. The Head of Department transmits an investigative dossier to the Faculty of Engineering Board and the University Central Student Disciplinary Committee (SDC).
  7. The student appears before the disciplinary committee to defend their submissions under constitutional principles of fair hearing.
  8. The University Senate considers the committee’s findings and ratifies an order of rustication or summary expulsion, notifying COREN to bar future professional licensure.

Acquiring hands-on competency in liquid extraction operations is essential for chemical engineers who will design and operate pharmaceutical purification columns, petrochemical aromatics extraction units, and nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities.

  • Standardized unit operations laboratory manual with approved liquid-liquid extraction protocols.
  • Raw bench workbook recording phase volumes, titration endpoint milliliters, calculated mass fractions, and distribution coefficients.
  • Chemical engineering laboratory sign-in register confirming equipment allocation and chemical requisition.
  • Plotted ternary phase equilibrium diagrams displaying binodal curves and experimentally determined conjugate tie-lines.

Students must record actual experimental measurements honestly, accounting for emulsion droplet entrainment and meniscus reading variations, rather than manufacturing idealized extraction data.

Under COREN professional regulations and university examination codes, fabricating unit operations experimental results is classified as severe academic fraud, carrying mandatory rustication and permanent loss of practical laboratory credits.

Maintaining rigorous laboratory ethics ensures that chemical engineering diplomates and graduates develop sound technical judgement required to design safe, efficient, and reliable industrial separation processes.

Was this education guide helpful?
Author / Contributor

Maryam Usman

Curriculum development officer and instructional designer. Specializes in Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) national curriculum alignment, textbook reviews, and formative learning assessment.

12 thoughts on this article

  1. Thank you for breaking this down so clearly. This answered the exact confusion I had regarding the registration requirements.

  2. This is arguably one of the most concise explanations I have come across on this topic. God bless you for sharing.

  3. Extremely helpful post. My younger sibling was facing this exact dilemma last week. I will share this link with him right away.

  4. Please what is the recommended procedure if the school portal is not reflecting the payment receipt after completing the bank branch remita transfer?

    1. Important question. For candidates completing online screening, ensure that all scanned documents are clear and in standard PDF/JPEG formats under 200KB. Blurry uploads or mismatched names (such as discrepancies between your NIN, JAMB slip, and O-Level certificate) trigger automated screening queries. If your name has an inversion, obtain a statutory affidavit of name correction and newspaper publication before screening begins.

  5. Thank you author for this timely post. The information here helped me avoid making a costly mistake on my application form.

  6. A very comprehensive review. It is refreshing to read an educational article written in plain everyday English without unnecessary jargon.

  7. Thank you for shedding light on this issue. Our school counselor never explained the difference between the aggregate score and the raw UTME mark like this.

  8. This guide covers all the critical angles. Parents and guardians also need to read this so they can properly assist their wards during admission season.

  9. Please I need a quick clarification: can an applicant who has already uploaded their O-level result make changes if there was an omission of a required subject?

    1. Thank you for this essential question. Yes, candidates can amend and re-upload their O-Level results if there was an omission or if you used ‘Awaiting Result’ (AR). However, this must be executed at an accredited JAMB Computer-Based Test (CBT) center—you cannot modify your O-Level profile from a private mobile device or cybercafe. Once the CBT operator re-uploads your scratch card details to the central JAMB portal, log in to your JAMB CAPS profile on your mobile browser (in desktop mode), navigate to ‘My O’Level’, and verify that all grades and subjects reflect accurately.

  10. Insightful analysis. Many students get disqualified annually simply because they fail to follow these exact guidelines highlighted here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Interactive Self-Service Portals

Free Educational Decision Tools & Calculators

Fast, automated tools designed to calculate statutory notice deadlines, draft withdrawal documents, and evaluate admission screening benchmarks.

Withdrawal Notice Period Calculator

Calculate exact mandatory school calendar notice deadlines before withdrawing your child to protect against fee forfeiture.

Calculate Notice

School Withdrawal Letter Generator

Generate professional, legally structured withdrawal requests and record clearance letters formatted for Nigerian schools.

Generate Letter

Disciplinary Appeal & Malpractice Checker

Evaluate fair hearing standards, examine appeal rights for suspended students, and review statutory penalty matrices.

Check Appeals
Editorial Helpdesk & Student Advisory

Encountering School Admission, Fee or Disciplinary Issues?

Our researchers break down school regulations, exam-body procedures, and dispute resolution mechanisms into clear, actionable advice. Get prompt guidance today.